Take, for instance, the tax rate reductions that Congress passed in 2003 (aka The Bush Tax Cuts or Tax Cuts for The Rich). The CBO made the dire prediction that Federal income tax revenues would fall as a result. And, if people actually didn't change behavior, they would have been right. But here's what actually happened to individual income tax revenues (in millions of dollars)
2003 | $793,699 |
2004 | $808,959 |
2005 | $927,222 |
2006 | $1,043,908 |
2007 estimate | $1,168,846 |
Source: US Office of the Budget
Now Democrats in Congress are busily engaged in trying to raise these very same tax rates. Why? In order to generate more revenue. Really? How? Using the very same incorrect assumptions that have "fooled" them before.
There are only two possible conclusions one can draw from this:
1. Democrats are just plain stupid.
2. Democrats get more "utility" (as economists would say) from being demagogues on the issue than they do from additional revenue.
I tend to go with #2, but a persuasive case can be made for #1 also.
No comments:
Post a Comment