3 Questions for the Settled Science Crowd

According to Progressives, Global Warming is "settled science".  Beyond the obvious point that it is settled only among those who wish it so, I do have three serious questions:

1.  Most of the climate models advanced a couple of decades ago predicted warming that has not since come to pass. How certain are you that the other predictions of these models are now accurate?

2. Why is it you think that we have the technology resources to counteract the enormous forces that have driven the climate to constantly change over millions of years?

3. What evidence can you offer that the cost of fighting a changing climate is less than the cost of adapting to a changing climate? Maybe instead of trying to protect existing vineyards in the Napa Valley it might be cheaper to plant vines in Greenland (like they did during the last warming period)?