If US Goes Net-Zero

Trillions of dollars spent to produce negligible temperature change. 

Tornado Activity Indicates the Climate is NOT Warming

The minute any element of severe weather appears, the Biden administration claims it is a result of global warming. This is just pure fantasy. If climate warming is linked to severity of tornadoes, this chart indicates that the climate must NOT be warming. 

CO2 Reduction Isn't Really a Goal, Is It?

Liberals say they want reduced CO2 emissions. But do they? If they did, they would be applauding the chart below. Why aren't they? Because all of this reduction was accomplished by the free market exploring new sources of inexpensive natural gas that replaced a lot of coal in electric production.
The truth is that CO2 reduction is not really their goal. Their goal is to make conventional energy sources more expensive so that they can more easily justify their Utopian schemes using wind and solar energy. And create a new source of taxation to fund these schemes.

Climate Changing? Gender Inequality is the Culprit.

If you want to understand the irrational extent of climate change hysterics, read the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. Among the policy recommendations from this illustrious group of "scientists" are "reduced gender inequality & marginalization in other forms,” “provisioning of adequate housing,” and “cash transfers”.  All scientifically proven ways to reduce the planet's temperature of course

Demagoguing Hurricanes

Last Week Hillary Clinton and Al Gore tried to convince you that "Climate Change" was responsible for "increased hurricane activity". The Inconvenient Truth, Al, is that hurricane activity has been unusually low recently. Facts simply don't matter to demagogues.

3 Questions for the Settled Science Crowd

According to Progressives, Global Warming is "settled science".  Beyond the obvious point that it is settled only among those who wish it so, I do have three serious questions:

1.  Most of the climate models advanced a couple of decades ago predicted warming that has not since come to pass. How certain are you that the other predictions of these models are now accurate?

2. Why is it you think that we have the technology resources to counteract the enormous forces that have driven the climate to constantly change over millions of years?

3. What evidence can you offer that the cost of fighting a changing climate is less than the cost of adapting to a changing climate? Maybe instead of trying to protect existing vineyards in the Napa Valley it might be cheaper to plant vines in Greenland (like they did during the last warming period)?