Wednesday, September 7, 2016
Worldwide Prosperity Explained in One Chart
It's hard to give any other explanation to this chart than "capitalism" or, if you prefer, "classic liberalism" --- the idea that if government protects property rights and otherwise leaves people to employ their own energies and ambitions, great wealth will result. The US, having more aggressively adopted this posture, obviously benefited the most.

Tuesday, September 6, 2016
Using Household Data for Income Analysis is Misleading
Democrats constantly make the "income inequality" argument by citing household data from the census bureau. But they don't cite a number of important facts about the household data itself. One being that the number of people in households varies considerably (and directly) with income. Another is the composition of the households with respect to age. Higher income quintiles have more people of working age in them. This shouldn't be terribly surprising, but apparently nobody in the media is smart enough to research and report on it.
Imagine you read a report that asserted that fans in Boston spend more more on ballpark concessions than fans in Oakland do, but that report didn't mention the fact that Fenway Park is always full of people while Oakland-Alameda is not. Would you think the reporter incolved was a) stupid or b) purposely misleading?

THIis

Imagine you read a report that asserted that fans in Boston spend more more on ballpark concessions than fans in Oakland do, but that report didn't mention the fact that Fenway Park is always full of people while Oakland-Alameda is not. Would you think the reporter incolved was a) stupid or b) purposely misleading?
THIis
Wednesday, August 31, 2016
The Foreign Investment Real Estate Bubble
Does this maybe look like a another bubble? Commercial real estate debt is widely held by banks and other financial institutions. What happens to their liquidity when this bubble bursts?
Energy Prices Continue To Decline Despite Governemnt
The American Enterprise Institute charts how the cost of energy has become a smaller and smaller portion of consumer spending over time. This has not happened because of windmills and solar panels that government keeps trying to push and subsidize. It has happened because new technology like hydraulic fracturing has made available more and cheaper oil and gas.

Wednesday, August 24, 2016
Demographics Spell Slow Growth for Housing
The demographic future does not bode well for the housing industry or consumption goods such as food and clothing.
Monday, August 15, 2016
What If Only Taxpayers Could Vote?
Right now any American citizen who is alive (and some who are not alive or not citizens) can vote. What if you actually had to pay income taxes in order to vote? CNN actually went back and looked at the 2012 presidential vote and recalculated the result based on that premise. Romney would have won in a landslide. Which explains why Democrats are so anxious to expand the numbers of people who don't pay income taxes. For those who don't pay taxes, the cost of more "free stuff" is zero.
Blah
Blah
Friday, August 5, 2016
MInimum Wage Bites Restaurant Workers in DC
What could possibly have happened in Washington DC that would have caused restaurant employment to drop suddenly this year? Anyone? Anyone? Buehler?
Monday, July 25, 2016
Regulation Adds to Cost, Benefits The Regulated
George Stigler at the University of Chicago fifty years ago noted that regulatory bodies, -- contrary to popular myth -- exist to serve the interests of those they regulate. Examples abound. From the sugar cartels to the American Bar Association, regulators protect incumbents from new competition and lower prices for consumers.
Jim Bessen from the Boston University School of Law recently published a new study providing evidence of this. In his study he estimates the regulation and other political activity accounts for about 40% of the increase in the rise of profits in the last 15 years.

Contribution to Rise in Operating Margins, 1971-2014, US public firms
For large corporations today the most productive investment they can make is not in R&D or marketing or cost-reducing capital improvements, but in influencing government regulators to insulate them from new competition. In his paper, Bessen provides a striking specific example of effect of the laughably named* 1992 Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act.
The act, of course, did nothing of the sort and predictably increased the relative value of cable firms.

Rise in Corporate Valuations / Assets around 1992 Cable Act;7 Cable TV firms and 2,137 other firms
So the next time you hear someone promising to "protect consumers" by regulating some business, remember that they are seeking just the opposite result.
* I am still struggling with whether the name of this act exceeds the Laughability Index of the Affordable Health Care Act. Pretty much a toss-up.
Jim Bessen from the Boston University School of Law recently published a new study providing evidence of this. In his study he estimates the regulation and other political activity accounts for about 40% of the increase in the rise of profits in the last 15 years.

Contribution to Rise in Operating Margins, 1971-2014, US public firms
For large corporations today the most productive investment they can make is not in R&D or marketing or cost-reducing capital improvements, but in influencing government regulators to insulate them from new competition. In his paper, Bessen provides a striking specific example of effect of the laughably named* 1992 Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act.
The act, of course, did nothing of the sort and predictably increased the relative value of cable firms.

Rise in Corporate Valuations / Assets around 1992 Cable Act;7 Cable TV firms and 2,137 other firms
So the next time you hear someone promising to "protect consumers" by regulating some business, remember that they are seeking just the opposite result.
* I am still struggling with whether the name of this act exceeds the Laughability Index of the Affordable Health Care Act. Pretty much a toss-up.
Wednesday, July 13, 2016
Understanding the Minimum Wage Over a Cup of Coffee
An article yesterday in the Seattle Times pointed this out:
"Last July, Starbucks raised its prices 3.5 times as much in Seattle as in the rest of the country. It raised the price of its typical coffeeshop purchase across the U.S. by 1 percent, but in Seattle by 3.5 percent."
Gee, now if there only some sort of theory that would explain the effects of Seattle's $15 minimum wage law. We could call it Economics 101 or something.
"Last July, Starbucks raised its prices 3.5 times as much in Seattle as in the rest of the country. It raised the price of its typical coffeeshop purchase across the U.S. by 1 percent, but in Seattle by 3.5 percent."
Gee, now if there only some sort of theory that would explain the effects of Seattle's $15 minimum wage law. We could call it Economics 101 or something.
Do Black Lives Really Matter?
The push for higher minimum wages in big cities has had exactly the effect you'd expect if you'd taken Economics 101 -- reducing the demand for low skilled, inexperienced labor. We’re now going to have lots of
young black men sitting around with nothing to do. What could possibly go wrong? For liberals, black lives only matter when there's a shooting. Otherwise, who cares?
Thursday, July 7, 2016
Tax Rates Matter to Scientists
A recent paper by Ufuk Akcigit and Salome Baslandze examined the effect of tax rates on the mobility of "superstar scientists" -- the top 1% of inventors with the most valuable patents -- found that countries enjoyed a "26% increase in foreign superstar inventors for each 10 % decrease in top marginal tax rates."
What this means is that top performers (in this particular case, scientists who can do their work in lots of places) tend to move from locations that tax their earnings heavily to places that tax them lightly. This is the same basic economic reason that people are moving out of high tax states like California and New York to low tax states like Florida and Texas.
Sometimes the empirical evidence of basic economic principles is complicated, but the principles are rather simple -- and predictable. If you want top talent to stay in your country, don't drive them away with high taxes.
What this means is that top performers (in this particular case, scientists who can do their work in lots of places) tend to move from locations that tax their earnings heavily to places that tax them lightly. This is the same basic economic reason that people are moving out of high tax states like California and New York to low tax states like Florida and Texas.
Sometimes the empirical evidence of basic economic principles is complicated, but the principles are rather simple -- and predictable. If you want top talent to stay in your country, don't drive them away with high taxes.
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
Why Are the Chinese Buying Gold?
Crowds of investors are often wrong, but one has to pause when you see them. Why are Chinese investors suddenly running to buy gold? What do they see that is causing them to shift from domestic investments to precious metals?


Wednesday, June 22, 2016
Washington Minimum Wage Failure
In 1998, Washington voters approved Initiative 688, dramatically boosting the state minimum wage from $5.15 to $5.70 on Jan. 1, 1999, and to $6.50 on Jan. 1, 2000, and, for the first time in the U.S., indexing the minimum wage to inflation. Since that time, Washington's population and total job growth has outpaced the national average, while employment in the hospitality and food service industries has lagged the average. There is really only one possible explanation for this. The imposition of a minimum wage "tax" on employers forced them to hire fewer people. While this is not a surprising outcome to anyone remotely familiar with economics, it will probably be a surprise to those in government, who are not members of that group. In fact, the Seattle City Council has doubled down on that job-killing policy by imposing a $15 minimum wage.
Tuesday, June 21, 2016
Trade Surpluses In Services
Mark Perry posts this chart on his website. I guess Donald Trump's take on this must be that the US is using Unfair Practices to run a trade surplus in services with China and Mexico. right?
Monday, June 13, 2016
Saturday, June 11, 2016
If You Can't Tax It, Steal It
If Congress somehow manages to constrain the tax revenue to the federal government, the federal government will simply steal it. Forfeiture is the process by which officers can take cash and property away from people without convicting or even charging them with a crime. This sort of thing is supposed to be prohibited by the 4th amendment to the constitution, but, then, who other than Antonin Scalia pays attention to that old thing anymore. [This is only federal forfeitures. If state totals were added it would probably be at least a half-billion dollars higher.]
Friday, June 10, 2016
High Income Earners Don't Pay a Fair Share
Newest data from the CBO shows, that, yes, the highest income earners don't pay a fair share.
The Gender Pay Gap (continued)
In a study, Preference for the Workplace, Investment in Human Capital, and Gender economists Matthew Wiswall of Arizona State University and Basit Zafar of the New York Federal Reserve show how men and women have different preferences when it comes to workplace attributes.

Why should it be any surprise that women choose jobs that are less remunerative than men (except to Hillary Clinton, of course)?
Why should it be any surprise that women choose jobs that are less remunerative than men (except to Hillary Clinton, of course)?
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
Denying Thousands of Years of History
If you look at the data below and conclude that any observed climate warming over the last 50 years is a "man-made crisis", then you are to be applauded, subsidized and welcomed into the community of right-thinkers. If on the other hand, you look at the data and think that maybe we ought not jump to conclusions or that natural climate forces are a lot more important than any human activity, you are a "denier"and may be prosecuted by your state's attorney general for saying so. And now you understand what happened during the Inquisition.
Monday, June 6, 2016
DC Metro Transit in Trouble
The Washington (DC) Metro Area Transit
Authority is in trouble. Its equipment is in disrepair and it is broke. Why?
Well, consider this.
Anyone have an idea about how they might
save some money? Anyone? Buehler? Anyone?
Saturday, June 4, 2016
Gee, Why Not Expand Social Security?
Wednesday, June 1, 2016
if you like your national debt, you can keep you national debt.
While President Obama claims he is reducing our national debt, the latest report from the Congressional Budget Office says otherwise. It's increasing and will shortly top 80% of GDP.
Sunday, May 22, 2016
Capitalism's Effects in One Chart
Maybe we could send Bernie Sanders and his supporters to China to explain how much better off they were before they emulated the capitalistic, free trade policies of the West.
Wednesday, May 18, 2016
Regulations Cost Workers $13,000 Per Year in Lost Income
A new study out of George Mason University shows that Federal regulations create a substantial drag on economi growth estimated at 0.8% of GDP per year. This might not sound like a lot, but:
- If regulation had been held constant at levels observed in 1980, the US economy would have been about 25 percent larger than it actually was as of 2012.
- This means that in 2012, the economy was $4 trillion smaller than it would have been in the absence of regulatory growth since 1980.
- This amounts to a loss of approximately $13,000 per capita, a significant amount of money for most American workers.
Do Billionaires Inherit Their Wealth?
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
Climate Skeptics Have Good Reason To Be
The chart below shows data from NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) reconstructing average world temperature over the last 500 thousand years. I think we can say with fair certainty that the previous warming cycles were not due to human activity. I think we can also say that it's a little much to accuse "climate skeptics" of having no basis at all for their skepticism.

Speaking of inconvenient facts, how many times have you heard climate hysterics cite tornado and hurricane activity as "evidence" of global warming
Speaking of inconvenient facts, how many times have you heard climate hysterics cite tornado and hurricane activity as "evidence" of global warming
Saturday, April 30, 2016
No Income Tax=Faster Growth
In their 2015 book, “The Wealth of States,” Arthur Laffer, Rex Sinquefield and Travis Brown examined the 11 states that have adopted income taxes since 1960. All 11 grew more slowly than the national average and all of them had slower job growth. Meanwhile, since 1990 the nine no-income-tax states have had twice the population growth and job creation as measured by payrolls, and about one-third faster total income growth than the high-tax states like New York, California and New Jersey. A no-income-tax policy is a flashing billboard telling employers: We’re open for business.

Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Tuesday, April 26, 2016
3 Questions for the Settled Science Crowd
According to Progressives, Global Warming is "settled science". Beyond the obvious point that it is settled only among those who wish it so, I do have three serious questions:
1. Most of the climate models advanced a couple of decades ago predicted warming that has not since come to pass. How certain are you that the other predictions of these models are now accurate?
2. Why is it you think that we have the technology resources to counteract the enormous forces that have driven the climate to constantly change over millions of years?
3. What evidence can you offer that the cost of fighting a changing climate is less than the cost of adapting to a changing climate? Maybe instead of trying to protect existing vineyards in the Napa Valley it might be cheaper to plant vines in Greenland (like they did during the last warming period)?
1. Most of the climate models advanced a couple of decades ago predicted warming that has not since come to pass. How certain are you that the other predictions of these models are now accurate?
2. Why is it you think that we have the technology resources to counteract the enormous forces that have driven the climate to constantly change over millions of years?
3. What evidence can you offer that the cost of fighting a changing climate is less than the cost of adapting to a changing climate? Maybe instead of trying to protect existing vineyards in the Napa Valley it might be cheaper to plant vines in Greenland (like they did during the last warming period)?
Monday, April 25, 2016
Obamacare's Effect on Worker Hours
Monday, April 18, 2016
Yes, The Middle Class is Shrinking . . .
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
The Rational Economic Reason for Income Inequality
Ever notice the price of gasoline or beef or television sets rises when demand increases and/or there is a shortage of supply? Ever notice that prices fall when there is a glut of supply or demand decreases? Of course you have. That's just the way economics works, right?
But when it comes to labor prices, somehow this relationship is not supposed to hold. Over the last thirty years (at least), the demand for high-skill labor -- the sort that requires advanced training and often a college degree -- has been increasing rapidly. The supply of that skilled labor has not increased nearly as fast. At the same time the demand for unskilled labor has been falling as more and more routine functions are done by machines rather than people. Meanwhile the supply of unskilled labor has been steady to increasing (especially due to immigration). What would you think the consequence of this to be? That's right, wages paid to higher skilled labor would grow faster than those paid to lower skilled labor.
This obvious and efficient* phenomena goes by another name in the political realm: Income Inequality. There is only one way to change the underlying fundamentals (assuming you want to): increase the supply of skilled labor and reduce the supply of unskilled labor. The former can only be accomplished by getting more people into post-high school programs (not necessarily a 4 year college) that equip them with higher value skills. The most likely way to accomplish the latter is to restrict immigration of low-skilled people. This would require the US to adopt an immigration policy that prioritized economic viability over family ties. Sorry, but that means that someone from China you don't know will get a visa rather than your illiterate brother Fernando.
* Income inequality serves the same economic purpose that any price does. The greater the income gap between skilled an unskilled, the more incentive there is to acquire skills. When there were plenty of semi-skilled jobs that paid you $50,000/year, the incentives were low. When those same skills will only pay you $35,000, the incentives are higher.
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
California Dreaming
What do you think the odds are that the recently adopted minimum wage (which will, in real terms, be about 30% higher than ever before) will have an impact on businesses and hiring in California. You would think there are some things so obvious even a California legislator could see them.
Thursday, March 31, 2016
Wage Insanity in California
The State of California has proposed a minimum wage law of $15/hour for the state. Let's just see how that might impact a couple of locales.
Current Median Wage
San Jose $27.61
Fresno $15.02
In San Jose, maybe 15% of the workforce is currently earning less than $15, but in Fresno, nearly half the workforce is earning less than $15. What do you think the impact on employment in Fresno will be when employers are forced to pay more to half its current workforce? A freshman Econ 101 student could figure this out. Apparently not the elected officials in Sacramento.
Current Median Wage
San Jose $27.61
Fresno $15.02
In San Jose, maybe 15% of the workforce is currently earning less than $15, but in Fresno, nearly half the workforce is earning less than $15. What do you think the impact on employment in Fresno will be when employers are forced to pay more to half its current workforce? A freshman Econ 101 student could figure this out. Apparently not the elected officials in Sacramento.
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
CEO Salaries and Orthodontists
Today the Bureau of Labor Statistics released it's newest OCCUPATIONAL EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES summary. The average Chief Executive Officer (about whose earnings Democrats are very agitated) earned $185,850 -- or 16% less than the average orthodontist (about whom Democrats seem much less agitated). As usual, facts seldom get in the way of a good demagogue.
CEO $185,800
Orthodontist $221,390
Petroleum Engineer $149,990
Lawyer $136,260
Dentist $177,230
Nurse Anesthetist $160,250
Anesthesiologist $258,100
Airline pilot $136,400
CEO $185,800
Orthodontist $221,390
Petroleum Engineer $149,990
Lawyer $136,260
Dentist $177,230
Nurse Anesthetist $160,250
Anesthesiologist $258,100
Airline pilot $136,400
Monday, March 28, 2016
Poverty and Marriage
Thursday, March 24, 2016
The Gender Gap in Awarded Degrees
Thursday, March 17, 2016
Manufacturing Jobs Have Nothing To Do With China
Donald Trump (and others) have been complaining that China has "stolen" all the manufacturing jobs from the United States. According to Trump, that's because we make "bad deals".
But the reality is that manufacturing output in the United States is at an all time high. We have never manufactured as many goods as we do today. What's not at an all time high is employment in manufacturing. Below is a chart showing the percentage of US employment in manufacturing.

This trend line is not a result of making "bad deals" with China. The downward trend is 50 years old. It predates the end of Bretton Woods. It predates the union-crushing, deregulating era of the late 1970s and early 1980s. It predates the era of Japanese dominance, the rise of the Asian tigers, and the recent surge in Chinese growth. What is driving this trend is technology. Manufacturers steadily improve manufacturing productivity, automating tasks that used to be done with labor.
This is not going to change no matter how many Yuge Deals you do. Trump is just another in a long line of demagogues who prey on the emotions of the economically ignorant.
But the reality is that manufacturing output in the United States is at an all time high. We have never manufactured as many goods as we do today. What's not at an all time high is employment in manufacturing. Below is a chart showing the percentage of US employment in manufacturing.
This trend line is not a result of making "bad deals" with China. The downward trend is 50 years old. It predates the end of Bretton Woods. It predates the union-crushing, deregulating era of the late 1970s and early 1980s. It predates the era of Japanese dominance, the rise of the Asian tigers, and the recent surge in Chinese growth. What is driving this trend is technology. Manufacturers steadily improve manufacturing productivity, automating tasks that used to be done with labor.
This is not going to change no matter how many Yuge Deals you do. Trump is just another in a long line of demagogues who prey on the emotions of the economically ignorant.
Wednesday, March 9, 2016
Baseball's Elite to Average Salaries Tops CEOs
Tuesday, March 8, 2016
Friday, March 4, 2016
Minimum Wage Explained in One Panel
At the same time this illustrates how people misuse the word “worth”. If McDonald’s were to charge $15 for a Big Mac, almost everyone would say "it’s not worth that". But somehow the people who McDonald’s might hire to produce the Big Mac are all “worth” $15/hour because, well, they’re good people who “deserve” to be paid that much. The bottom line is the bottom line. You don't hire people if you have to pay more than their economic worth. No matter how "worthy" they are.
Tuesday, March 1, 2016
Wages and Productivity
Everyone is complaining that wages are not growing as fast as they used to. Do you think the information below might have something to do with that? Why would you expect wages to grow rapidly when productivity is not?
Monday, February 22, 2016
Government Control=Increasing Costs
Let's examine six fairly basic needs of human beings:
1. Clothing
2. Food
3. Shelter
4. Health care
5. Education
These are ranked in increasing order of the government's control and subsidy of their creation and delivery.
They are also ranked in the increasing order of inflation adjusted cost increases over the last fifty years.
Coincidence? When government subsidizes something, the cost will rise much faster. Which leads to cries for more government subsidy. That's a pretty neat scheme -- if you work in government. Not so much if you're paying for it as a taxpayer or consumer.
1. Clothing
2. Food
3. Shelter
4. Health care
5. Education
These are ranked in increasing order of the government's control and subsidy of their creation and delivery.
They are also ranked in the increasing order of inflation adjusted cost increases over the last fifty years.
Coincidence? When government subsidizes something, the cost will rise much faster. Which leads to cries for more government subsidy. That's a pretty neat scheme -- if you work in government. Not so much if you're paying for it as a taxpayer or consumer.
Thursday, February 11, 2016
What Do You Do When a War Has Failed?
If 50 years ago you started a war that failed to achieve its objective while consuming ever increasing amounts of money, what would you do?
Friday, February 5, 2016
Rising Wages Do Not Always Reflect Productivity
In competitive enterprises, rising salaries are generally an indication of increasing productivity, In anti-competitive organizations, however . . . .
Thursday, January 28, 2016
Deja Vu Corporate Debt
Distressed corporate debt (bonds whose yields are at least 10 points above Treasuries) have now reached the levels at the beginning of the 2008 financial crisis. This is the direct result of the Federal Reserve's near-zero interest rates which, predictably, encouraged blind risk taking. What does the Fed plan to do this time?
Saturday, January 23, 2016
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
The US IS Not Planning to Reduce It's Debt Burden. Ever.
It's official. The United States has no plans to reduce the burden of debt they have placed on the economy. They just plan to keep borrowing more and more and more until . . . ?
Monday, January 18, 2016
Employment Suicide in DC
Mark Perry points out that the results are pretty consistent now in all the jurisdiction that have adopted minimum wage employment-prevention legislation. The latest data is from Washington DC.

Now the same people who have adopted this employment suicide are angry that Walmart is downsizing their operations in DC. But any semi-intelligent person (Yes, I understand this leaves out much of DC government) should have realized this would happen. Contrary to what Democrats wish, the primary objective is to earn a return on their shareholder's investment, not to provide jobs and benefits.
"Behind closed doors, Walmart officials were more frank about the reasons the company was downsizing. He said the company cited the District’s rising minimum wage, now at $11.50 an hour and possibly going to $15 an hour if a proposed ballot measure is successful in November. He also said a proposal for legislation requiring D.C. employers to pay into a fund for family and medical leave for employees, and another effort to require a minimum amount of hours for hourly workers were compounding costs and concerns for the retailer"
This the result of the District's perverse anti-employment policies is that there will be fewer jobs for the least skilled of DC residents and less access to low-price stores like Walmart.
Now the same people who have adopted this employment suicide are angry that Walmart is downsizing their operations in DC. But any semi-intelligent person (Yes, I understand this leaves out much of DC government) should have realized this would happen. Contrary to what Democrats wish, the primary objective is to earn a return on their shareholder's investment, not to provide jobs and benefits.
"Behind closed doors, Walmart officials were more frank about the reasons the company was downsizing. He said the company cited the District’s rising minimum wage, now at $11.50 an hour and possibly going to $15 an hour if a proposed ballot measure is successful in November. He also said a proposal for legislation requiring D.C. employers to pay into a fund for family and medical leave for employees, and another effort to require a minimum amount of hours for hourly workers were compounding costs and concerns for the retailer"
This the result of the District's perverse anti-employment policies is that there will be fewer jobs for the least skilled of DC residents and less access to low-price stores like Walmart.
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
Government Subsidies Fuel Huge Tuition Increases
Previously I have commented about how college tuition costs have increased so much faster than any other industry in America.

Now Grey Gordon and Aaron Hedlund at the National Bureau of Economic Research have published a paper Accounting for the Rise in College Tuition confirming the source of this stratospheric rise -- tuition subsidizes (sometimes called "financial aid"). Their conclusion:
"colleges respond to expansions of financial aid by increasing tuition. In fact, the tuition response completely crowds out any additional enrollment that the financial aid expansion would otherwise induce, resulting instead in an enrollment decline."
\
So in its usual perverse way, government distorts markets creating results that are exactly opposite to the ostensible goal.
Sound anything like what government did when it decided to increase home-ownership by subsidizing mortgages to buyers who were otherwise not qualified to obtain them? It should. Just as people were lured by mortgage subsidies to buy homes they really couldn't afford, lenders (in this case 90% government) lure young people to borrow money to pursue college degrees that many won't even achieve with the promise that college is a "sure thing" to a good job.
Bottom line: Owning a home and getting a college education are good things worth incurring debt for the right people who have a solid likelihood to repay. Government subsidies distort this equation such that all sorts of people who don't meet this requirement are enticed to borrow. People should be free to make bad decisions, but it's wrong for your government to actively enable them.

Now Grey Gordon and Aaron Hedlund at the National Bureau of Economic Research have published a paper Accounting for the Rise in College Tuition confirming the source of this stratospheric rise -- tuition subsidizes (sometimes called "financial aid"). Their conclusion:
"colleges respond to expansions of financial aid by increasing tuition. In fact, the tuition response completely crowds out any additional enrollment that the financial aid expansion would otherwise induce, resulting instead in an enrollment decline."
\
So in its usual perverse way, government distorts markets creating results that are exactly opposite to the ostensible goal.
Sound anything like what government did when it decided to increase home-ownership by subsidizing mortgages to buyers who were otherwise not qualified to obtain them? It should. Just as people were lured by mortgage subsidies to buy homes they really couldn't afford, lenders (in this case 90% government) lure young people to borrow money to pursue college degrees that many won't even achieve with the promise that college is a "sure thing" to a good job.
Bottom line: Owning a home and getting a college education are good things worth incurring debt for the right people who have a solid likelihood to repay. Government subsidies distort this equation such that all sorts of people who don't meet this requirement are enticed to borrow. People should be free to make bad decisions, but it's wrong for your government to actively enable them.
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
Median HH Income Has Fallen, But Not Because Workers are Earning Less
Yes, median household income has fallen. Not because those who are working are earning less, but because the number of households without earners is increasing. One-quarter of all households now have nobody employed and just subsist on the huge number of welfare handouts available In many states you are actually better off not working than having a job.
Friday, December 18, 2015
Yes, The Middle Class is Shrinking. It's Gotten Wealthier
I'm getting a little tired of hearing from both Democrats and Republicans that "the middle class is shrinking". Yes, the middle class is shrinking. And it's because they've gotten wealthier.
1967 2014
Share of American Households earning $100,000
or more (2014 constant dollars) 8.1% 24.7%
Share of American Households earning
$50-100,000 (2014 constant dollars) 33.7% 28.5%
Share of American Households earning
$50,000 or less (2014 constant dollars) 58.2% 46.8%
Why isn't this a good thing? Does this look like something that "must be fixed"? When your argument for socialism is that the Middle Class are getting richer, I think you've got a problem.
Demagogue: A leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims in order to gain power.
1967 2014
Share of American Households earning $100,000
or more (2014 constant dollars) 8.1% 24.7%
Share of American Households earning
$50-100,000 (2014 constant dollars) 33.7% 28.5%
Share of American Households earning
$50,000 or less (2014 constant dollars) 58.2% 46.8%
Why isn't this a good thing? Does this look like something that "must be fixed"? When your argument for socialism is that the Middle Class are getting richer, I think you've got a problem.
Demagogue: A leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims in order to gain power.
Thursday, December 17, 2015
Want More Unemployment? Adopt a Minimum Wage.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

